| Rank | Model | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen3.6 Plus | Alibaba | 94.3% |
| 2 | Llama 3.1 405B | Meta | 88.6% |
| 3 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Anthropic | 88.0% |
| 4 | Llama 3.1 70B | Meta | 87.5% |
| 5 | Claude 3 Opus | Anthropic | 85.0% |
| 6 | DeepSeek V2.5 | DeepSeek | 84.6% |
| 7 | Qwen2.5 72B | Alibaba | 84.0% |
| 8 | GPT 4o | OpenAI | 84.0% |
| 9 | GPT 4o mini | OpenAI | 80.5% |
| 10 | Llama 3.1 8B | Meta | 80.0% |
Figures are taken from public model cards, technical reports and vendor announcements, and are approximate where sources disagree. Results from different benchmark versions or tool-use settings never share a column: Terminal Bench 2.1, 3.0 and DeepSWE v1.1 are distinct benchmarks, and HLE with tools is separate from HLE without tools. Only models with a published result are listed; the score column is shaded relative to the best and worst result on this benchmark.